|
PrototypesThe first prototype UAV is built on a Lite Machines 110 remote control helicopter. The choice of the LM-110 is an ideal platform for debugging both the autopilot and the command and control software. It has nearly indestructable, full flapping plastic rotor blades and can take nearly any abuse from "software bugs" or Pilot Error.
We now have new photographs of the first prototype with the camera head,
the ground station and the video feed. On the right is the video feed test
(click to zoom), showing the hotel room and television.
The boom is still dented and the gearbox split, which you can
see in the photograph at the top of the page
(click to zoom in)).
The new prototype is in the process of being built. Some parts are on order, others are currently being modified. They are:
The LiteMachines is a great beginning helicopter. But it lacked the
payload capacity for the full onboard system and autopilot, so a larger
model was required. The Concept 60 has a 10 cc engine and a payload
capacity of about 4 kg. The comparison between the first and second
geneneration prototypes is quite amazing, as seen in these images:
The real-time tasks onboard are handled by the AVR Mega103 microcontroller.
It has 64 IO lines, PWM output, a UART and is supported by gcc.
Makes a great development environment. The image on the left is
of the prototyping board; the production system will have custom
PCB's rather than using the large proto-board. The actual controller
is the small raised portion in the upper left corner. The image on
the right is the custom wire harness to interface with a HiTec receiver,
some number of gyros and eight servos. (Click on either image to zoom)
The realtime tasks that it will handle are:
They build embedded BSD machines for firewalls. Power consumption
is a little high at 10 W, but it has GPIO lines, serial console
support, and a mini-PCI slot. The formfactor will require a fairly
large airframe. No board has yet been ordered; the prototype is
still tethered to the ground. We will most likely move to the
onboard system once the command and control software is more
mature. No sense in wrecking a large helicopter with the onboard
system before we're ready.
No low-cost "Attitude / Heading / Roll System" has been found, so we've
design our own IMU.
Of the commercially available choices, the one from
PC Flight Systems
might work. It uses MEMS gyros and
accelerometers to computer the attitude of the sensors. They have
an RS-232 port and software for WinCE. Rough cost is $1,400.
You can see a screen shot from the curves program from the 1.5 release. It samples the gyros and performs rate integration on board. The results are then sent to the ground station for display with the EFIS::AI widget.
The
MIT project
used the
Crossbow IMU,
but the single unit prices are in the $4,000 to $6,000 range.
I've written
a survey of the available units.
The first prototype was built in September 2001 and flown under manual control via the computer in October. It consisted of: Lite Machines 110As described above...
Rather than consuming all of the GPIO lines on the board, this device
can control eight servos. It has a very simple programming interface
and can be used with minimal software over a serial port. A major draw
back is that it requires an extra battery, something the LM-110 has
trouble carrying. Luckily the power draw is very low and it can share
the 7.2V cell with the xcam. 20 mA at 9V is not bad.
It's cheap, USB and has four axes. The stick twists, which I have mapped
to the anti-torque pedals. More details are in the
README.
The buttons provide a force-release style trim (implemented by the
flyer
program).
You can see the ground station in the photograph on the right with the
Release 1.1
version running.
Yes, I bought one. But not with that damn pop-under ad. Quality
is low, but the cost is too. Power consumption isn't too bad,
about 80 mA at 9V. You can see it mounted on the body to the
right (click to zoom in). Also visible in the photograph is the
relocated 4.8V battery (underneath the keel).
Most of the body and housing was removed to make it
easier to mount. You can see the camera itself bolted to the
keel. In
this picture
you can see the antenna wrapped in bubble wrap and secured to
the keel.
|
$Id: prototype.html,v 1.57 2002/08/05 03:44:39 tramm Exp $ |